Legal Opinion

Dayan v. McDonald's Corp.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 18, 1978No. 78-1125PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McGLOON

Plaintiff Raymond Dayan entered into an agreement with defendant McDonald’s Corporation for the acquisition and operation of McDonald’s restaurants in Paris, France. As part of the agreement, the parties agreed that both Elinois and France had jurisdiction to resolve disputes that should arise thereunder. Subsequently, McDonald’s filed a suit in France alleging that Dayan had breached certain conditions of the agreement and sought to terminate his operating licenses. McDonald’s also filed a second suit for trademark infringement. Both suits are still pending. Thereafter, Dayan filed a suit in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Farah v. FarahAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  2. Paddington Corp. v. Foremost Sales Promotions, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1973
  3. Kahn v. KahnAppellate Court of Illinois · 1945
  4. Pesquera Del Pacifico v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  5. Goldberg v. GoldbergAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Dayan v. McDonald's Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  2. DIAL 800 v. FesbinderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  3. Baal v. McDonald's Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  4. Dayan v. McDonald's Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  5. Ball v. Deere & Co.District Court, C.D. Illinois · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API