James N. Kirby, Pty Ltd. v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CARNES, Circuit Judge:
This case, the facts of which began in Australia and ended in Alabama, is about Himalaya clauses, Clauses Paramount, COGSA, the package limitation defense, FBLs, FIATA, and the like. In short, it is a bill of lading case. The issue it presents us is whether a railroad’s liability, if any, to a shipper for damage done to goods by the derailment of train is limited by the “Himalaya clause” in either of two bills of lading that were issued for the transport of the goods.
A Himalaya clause is a clause in a bill of lading that extends the carrier’s defenses and limitations of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Robert C. Herd & Co. v. Krawill MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. O'ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Tropical Shipping & Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
- Assicurazioni Generali v. D'Amico and Harrington & Company, Inc., Jointly and SeverallyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- Hiram Walker & Sons, Inc. v. Kirk LineCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. James N. Kirby, Pty Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
- In Re Nigeria Charter Flights Contract LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2007
- Ex Parte Leasecomm Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003
- In Re West Caribbean Airways, S.A.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2007
- Mitsui Marine & Fire Ins. Co. v. Hanjin Shipping Co. Ltd.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.