Legal Opinion

Waddingham v. Tubbs

California Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 1892No. 14784PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Bernardino County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Vanclief, C.

This is an action to quiet the alleged title of plaintiff to lots numbered 7, 8, and 9, in block 42, of the town of Ontario, in the county of San Bernardino. The cause was tried by the court, and the judgment was in favor of plaintiff for lots 8 and 9, and in favor of defendant for lot numbered 7.

Each party moved for a new trial upon a distinct bill of exceptions. Both motions were denied, and each party has appealed, — the defendant from the judgment against him as to lots 8 and 9, and from the order denying his motion for a new trial; and the plaintiff from the judgment against…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dow v. RossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Barron v. DelevalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Mullally v. Irish-American Benevolent SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Gray v. WinderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  5. San Fernando Farm Homestead Ass'n v. PorterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hamaker v. KeatingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  2. People v. WelchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  3. McCordic v. CrawfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Forni v. YoellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Call v. Los Angeles County General HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API