Legal Opinion · Dissent

Chase Home Finance, LLC v. Scroggin

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided December 19, 2017No. AC39191Published

1DissentBear, J.

The defendant, Daniel Scroggin also known as Daniel J. Scroggin also known as Daniel F. Scroggin, appeals from the judgment of strict foreclosure 1 rendered against him by the trial court on April 18, 2016, in favor of the substitute plaintiff, AJX Mortgage Trust 1, a Delaware Trust, Wilmington Savings Fund Society, F.S.B., Trustee. 2 On appeal, the defendant argues that the court erred in rendering the judgment of strict foreclosure (1) based on a default for failure to plead, because Chase Home Finance, LLC (Chase), significantly amended the pleadings after the default entered, and he was,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Higgins v. KarpSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  2. Mazulis v. ZeldnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  3. Willamette Management Associates, Inc. v. PalczynskiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
  4. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. BertrandConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  5. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. CorneliusConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API