Legal Opinion

David Walter Copeland v. Tom Green and Kelly L. York

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided December 27, 1991No. 90-7506PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Per curiam

David Walter Copeland is a repeat litigant. In March 1990, he filed eight complaints with the district court, and he sought to proceed in forma pauperis in each of these lawsuits. On March 27,1990, the district court dismissed the eight lawsuits as frivolous and ordered that any future complaints submitted by Copeland not be filed unless approved by a judge of the court. This order was the subject of a previous appeal to this court, which was dismissed for want of prosecution.

Following the March 27, 1990, order, Copeland continued to deluge the district court with complaints and other papers.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Robert Procup v. C. StricklandCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Miller v. DonaldCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
  2. Martin-Trigona v. ShawCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
  3. Washington v. AlaimoDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1996
  4. Barash v. KatesDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2008
  5. United States v. Carmelo EtienneCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2024

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API