Legal Opinion

Irene Alvarado, Reg. 17513-170 v. Virginia McLaughlin Warden, Federal Reformatory for Women, Alderson, West Virginia

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided October 23, 1973No. 73-1111PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DONALD RUSSELL, Circuit Judge:

Section 7237(d), 26 U.S.C., provided, inter alia, that a convicted narcotic law offender was ineligible for parole consideration. That section, however, was repealed as a part of the enactment of the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1970, effective May 1, 1971. 1 Under this Act, persons convicted of, narcotic law violations were entitled to the same parole consideration as other offenders had under the general parole provision set forth in Section 4202, 18 U.S.C. The Act included, though, a “savings” provision to the effect that,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Anderson v. CorallSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Bradley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. United States of America Ex Rel. Benigno Marrero v. Warden, Lewisburg PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
  5. United States Ex Rel. Rowe v. NicholsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1935

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Warden v. MarreroSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Conner v. GriffithWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1977
  3. United States v. Novenda L. CookCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
  4. United States v. Sorel SheadCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
  5. United States v. SantanaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API