Legal Opinion
Brink v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided June 27, 1932No. 6106PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HICKS, Circuit Judge.
Appellant and James H. Brink, Harry 'Schultz, and Walter Keller, were indicted ■for a conspiracy to violate the National Prohibition Act under section 88, title 18, U. S. C. (18 USCA § 88). Brink alone was put upon trial. He was convicted.
There are numerous assignments of error. Many of - them relate to matters unexcepted to in the court below and therefore present nothing for review.
1 Several assignments challenge the denial of a directed verdict. They are all overruled. We have examined the evidence and find it sufficient to submit the ease to the jury.
1. Earl Marshall…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. LefkowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Segurola v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Rudd v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
- Kettenbach v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1913
- Gridley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press v. American Telephone & Telegraph CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
- Norman J. Deschenes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
- Winston M. Reynolds v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
- Crawford v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
- Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. Alaska Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.