Legal Opinion

Cambio Health Solutions, LLC v. Reardon

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 27, 2007No. 04-6485, 05-5041UnpublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUTTON, Circuit Judge.

Does a parent company holding a majority, but less than a 100%, interest in its subsidiary enjoy a qualified privilege to interfere with the contractual relations of that subsidiary? After determining that this question of state law remained an open one in Tennessee—and one upon which much of the $5.9 million jury verdict in this case turned—we certified the question to the Tennessee Supreme Court. Having now learned from our sister court that a company with less than a 100% interest in a subsidiary does not have a qualified privilege to interfere with the contractual…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Hodges v. S.C. Toof & Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Philip Morris USA v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. K & T Enterprises, Inc., D/B/A Dairy Queen of Blissfield, and Tahani Khoury v. Zurich Insurance Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. In re Ford Motor Co. Spark Plug & 3-Valve Engine Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2014
  2. Cooley v. Lincoln Electric Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2011
  3. Cummings Inc. v. Bp Products North America, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2009
  4. Academy of Allergy & Asthma in Primary Care v. Amerigroup Tennessee, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2025
  5. Clark v. Louisville Jefferson County Metro GovernmentDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2024

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API