Legal Opinion
Hursh v. Killits
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 3, 1932No. 6756PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILBUR, Circuit Judge.
Petitioners ask a writ of mandamus to compel respondent to settle a bill of exceptions in the ease of United States of America v. Hursh et al. An order to show cause was issued, and respondent appeared in oppoai*904tion to the petition. It appears that petitioners Hursh and others were convicted of a conspiracy to defraud by use of the mails. Thereafter, within due time, petitioners presented a document of 5,000 legal size pages which they styled “Bill of Exceptions.” It was in fact a transcript of the testimony with some slight omissions, and was in no sense a bill of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Newton v. Consolidated Gas Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Mammoth Oil Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Lincoln v. ClaflinSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Zeller's Lessee v. EckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1846
- Rosen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Metzler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
- Conway v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944
- Yangtsze Rapid S. S. Co. v. Deutsch-Asiatische BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932
- Tudor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944
- Coberth v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.