Legal Opinion
Warren Featherbone Co. v. Landauer
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Wisconsin
Decided November 30, 1903PublishedCited by 19 opinions
In Equity.
1Opinion of the Court
BUNN, District Judge.
This is a motion upon a petition filed by the defendants for an injunctional order against the complainant, restraining it from issuing notices or printed circulars to its customers •or others warning them against purchasing defendants’ goods. In order to understand the question at issue, it will be necessary to state briefly the purpose of the suit and the answer to the complainant’s bill.
The suit is brought by the complainant, a corporation having its principal place of business at Three Oaks, Mich,, for infringement of the complainant’s trade-mark. By the allegations…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Adriance, Platt & Co. v. National Harrow Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1903
- Emack v. KaneUnited States Circuit Court · 1888
- A. B. Farquhar Co. v. National Harrow Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1900
3Cited by19 opinions
- A. Hollander & Son, Inc. v. Imperial Fur Blending Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
- Virtue v. Creamery Package Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- United States Galvanizing & Plating Equipment Corp. v. Hanson-Van Winkle-Munning Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1939
- Virtue v. Creamery Package Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1910
- Asbestos Shingle, Slate & Sheathing Co. v. H. W. Johns-Manville Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1911
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.