Oscar John Huguez v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HAUK, District Judge:
Here raised in this appeal is an issue which is coming before this and other Federal Appellate Courts with increasing frequency- — the validity and constitutionality of border searches conducted without a search warrant by forcible and intrusive invasion of an intimate human body cavity. In this case the appellant’s rectum was searched by forcible digital insertion and manipulation in locating and extracting four narcotic packets which were seized and introduced in evidence at appellant’s trial.
This issue necessarily raises the questions of “reasonableness” of the search…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- McGee v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
- Mary Beth G. v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Darrel Paterson Simpson, Robert MacRiner Anderson, and James Roy FreemanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Lynn Dale Bogart, Edward Elbert Wingender, Teodaro Risquez, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Jones v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.