Legal Opinion

In Re Falcone

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided May 31, 2007No. 13-41676PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION REGARDING MOTION TO DISMISS PETITION

WILLIAM C. HILLMAN, Bankruptcy Judge.

I. Introduction

The matter before the Court is the motion of Dartmouth Supply, Inc. (“Dartmouth”) to dismiss the petition of Mary G. Falcone (the “Debtor”) on the grounds that the Debtor failed to comply with 11 U.S.C. § 109(h)(3). Although the Debtor acknowledges that she did not comply with the statutory requirements, she asks that I exercise my discretion and find that she has substantially complied. For the reasons set forth below, I will enter an order granting the motion to dismiss.

II.…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. In Re TomcoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. In Re RossUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2006
  3. In Re CleaverUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2005
  4. Hedquist v. Fokkena (In Re Hedquist)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
  5. In Re RiosUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2005

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re FiorilloDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2011
  2. Taal v. SumskiBankruptcy Appellate Panel of the First Circuit · 2014
  3. DeHart v. John (In re John)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. Charles Muszynski v. Roberto Roman ValentinBankruptcy Appellate Panel of the First Circuit · 2025
  5. In re: Joseph P. McCloskey Diaz; Lourdes Vazquez HuykeUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API