Legal Opinion
Taal v. Sumski
Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the First Circuit
Decided January 30, 2014No. BAP No. 13-041; Bankruptcy No. 13-11253-BAHPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOROFF, Bankruptcy Judge.
Baboucar B. Taal (the “Debtor”) appeals pro se from the order dismissing his chap*683ter 13 ease for failure to complete, within the statutory time period, the credit counseling required pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 109(h)(1).1 For the reasons set forth below, the Panel AFFIRMS.
BACKGROUND
On May 13, 2013, the Debtor filed a chapter 13 bankruptcy petition. With the petition, the Debtor also filed a certificate indicating that he had received an individual [or group] briefing that complied with the provisions required by §§ 109(h)(1) and 111. The certificate, however, reflected…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Fleet Data Processing Corp. v. Branch (In Re Bank of New England Corp.)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the First Circuit · 1998
- Boylan v. George E. Bumpus, Jr. Construction Co. (In Re George E. Bumpus, Jr. Construction Co.)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the First Circuit · 1998
- Lessard v. Wilton-Lyndeborough Cooperative School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
- Gonzalez-Ruiz v. Doral Financial Corp.Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the First Circuit · 2006
- Howard v. Lexington Investments, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Charles Muszynski v. Roberto Roman ValentinBankruptcy Appellate Panel of the First Circuit · 2025
- Emiabata v. JaworskiDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2024
- In re: Charles MuszynskiUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2024