Doremus v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Kern Thompson Frost, Chief Justice
Appellant Craig Anthony Doremus challenges his conviction for driving while intoxicated. He contends the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence and in instructing the jury. Concluding that appellant’s issues do not afford him appellate relief, we affirm the trial court’s judgment.
Factual and Procedural Background
Officer Samuel Glaze saw appellant driving the wrong way down a one-way street. During the. stop that followed, Officer Glaze detected the “smell of alcoholic beverage” emanating from appellant’s car and noticed that…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Madden v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
- Pena v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009
- Pena, Jose LuisCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
- McGee v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Edward Dean Gomez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2018
- Jennifer Nalls v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2018
- Romel Gaitan, Jr. v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2018
- The State of Texas v. Jesus Sanchez, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2025