Legal Opinion

People v. Miller

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 19, 1920No. Crim. No. 483PublishedCited by 16 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Stanislaus County. L. W. Fulkerth, Judge. Affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.

Defendant was. charged, in an information in the superior court of Stanislaus County, with the theft of a light Buiek automobile, the property of one J. W.. Boss. He was convicted by a jury, and from the judgment sentencing him to the penitentiary and from an order denying Ms motion for a new trial, an appeal has been taken. Some of the facts, upon which respondent relies for a justification of the verdict, are undisputed and others follow as a fair inference from certain evidence' appearing in the record. We are warranted by this record in stating the case as follows: On November 16, 1917,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. LuchettiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. People v. WaughCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
  3. People v. FittsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. People v. McFarlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. People v. WissenfeldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. People v. RussellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. People v. WellsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. State v. MellorUtah Supreme Court · 1928

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API