Legal Opinion

State v. Barrager

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided September 18, 2026No. 128787Published

1Opinion of the Court

No. 128,787 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. JOSEPH JONATHAN BARRAGER, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. Criminal statutes and penalties in effect at the time of a criminal act are controlling. 2. In a direct appeal, a defendant will receive the benefit of any change in the law that occurs while the direct appeal is pending. 3. The Ex Post Facto Clause of the United States Constitution forbids legislative enactments that impose a punishment for an act that was either not punishable when it was committed or that impose additional punishments to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Lynce v. MathisSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Stansbury v. HanniganSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  4. Campbell v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
  5. State v. ErvinSupreme Court of Kansas · 2025

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API