State v. Ervin
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 126,747 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. JAVAN JERMAINE ERVIN, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. Prosecutors have wide latitude to conduct the State's case in a manner that does not offend the defendant's constitutional right to a fair trial. They act within that wide latitude when they argue about evidence introduced at trial or ask the jury to draw reasonable inferences based on the evidence. But they exceed that wide latitude if they argue facts or factual inferences outside of what the evidence shows. 2. The invited error doctrine is…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- State v. WardSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
- State v. ArnettSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018
- Trotter v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
- State v. JacquesSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Chauncey Brownfield v. Jeff Zmuda, et al.District Court, D. Kansas · 2026
- Roderick Coulter v. State of Kansas, et al.District Court, D. Kansas · 2026
- Rogers v. MollSupreme Court of Kansas · 2026
- State v. BarragerCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2026
- State v. BellamyCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2026
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.