Legal Opinion

Napier v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 23, 1994No. 09-94-121 CRPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BROOKSHIRE, Justice.

Appellant, Paul Dean Napier, was indicted for the offense of aggravated sexual assault and after having pleaded guilty, evidence was then submitted to a jury by the State and the appellant for the purpose of assessing punishment. The jury found the appellant guilty as instructed by the court and assessed punishment of appellant at 40 years imprisonment in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. No fine was assessed.

Appellant plead guilty to sexually assaulting his step-daughter, S.M. Evidence established that appellant had begun…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Ex Parte DuffyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  3. Ex Parte CruzCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  4. Miller-El v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  5. Craig v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Alcides Larrinaga A.K.A. Alcides Larringa v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2015
  2. Don Lee Lewis Jr. v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2025
  3. Garry Fuller v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2015
  4. Juan Alvarez Munoz v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2004
  5. Larrinaga, AlcidesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API