Miller-El v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
CLINTON, Judge.
In a single trial appellant was convicted as a party to the offenses of murder and attempted capital murder. The jury assessed punishment at life in each cause, and the trial court ordered that the sentences run consecutively.
The State was allowed to adduce evidence over objection during the punishment stage of appellant’s trial regarding the medical condition and prognosis of the victim of the attempted capital murder offense. In an unpublished opinion, the Dallas Court of Appeals reversed appellant’s conviction, holding that…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Enmund v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Booth v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- South Carolina v. GathersSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Stiehl v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Ortiz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by222 opinions
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009
- Rogers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
- Ex Parte ChavezCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
- Etheridge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Barrow v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
217 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.