Legal Opinion

Craig v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 4, 1992No. 333-90PublishedCited by 107 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

BAIRD, Judge.

A jury convicted appellant of murder and assessed punishment at confinement for life and a ten thousand dollar fine. Tex.Penal Code Ann. § 19.02. The Court of Appeals affirmed. Craig v. State, 783 S.W.2d 620 (Tex.App.—El Paso 1989). Appellant presents one ground for review. We will remand.

The Court of Appeals found eight instances of “deficient performance by trial counsel.” Craig, 783 S.W.2d at 626. The court noted:

None of these incidents can be attributable to colorable tactical decision. Nor are they independent, isolated…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Ex Parte DuffyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  3. Ex Parte CruzCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  4. Boyd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  5. Ex Parte WalkerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by107 opinions

  1. McFarland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  2. Garcia v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
  3. Banda v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
  4. Oestrick v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1997
  5. Ex Parte LangleyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992

102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API