Legal Opinion

Ganchoff v. Bullock

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1940PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWickhem, J.

Plaintiffs’ action involves the validity of a second mortgage given by plaintiffs to defendant as part of a refinancing transaction involving a mortgage to Home Owners’ Loan Corporation (hereinafter called “HOLC”). Plaintiffs contend that the second mortgage in question was without the consent of the HOLC and against public policy.

The facts are not in dispute and are briefly as follows: The property involved consists of four acres of land in Bay View owned by plaintiffs. Prior to the transactions in question the south two acres of this land were subject to a mortgage to the Bay View Building…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McAllister v. DrapeauCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Bay City Bank v. WhiteMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Ridge Investment Corp. v. NicolosiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1937

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. McVicar v. PetersWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Murphy v. Omaha Loan & Building Ass'nNebraska Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Walker v. Oakley Et Ux.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  4. Haugens v. FosterAppellate Court of Illinois · 1943
  5. Neavitt v. UppArizona Supreme Court · 1941

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API