Legal Opinion
J.H. Westerbeke Corp. v. Onan Corp.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided February 14, 1984No. Civ. A. 81-0260-MAPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MAZZONE, District Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
This is an action under Section 2 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 2, and under various state law claims, for the wrongful refusal to renew a distributorship. The plaintiff, J.H. Westerbeke Corporation (Westerbeke), is a Massachusetts corporation in the business of selling and servicing propulsion engines and diesel-powered electric generating sets (gensets) for marine applications. The defendant, Onan Corporation (Onan), is a Minnesota corporation in the business of manufacturing and selling gasoline-driven and diesel-powered electric…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- American Tobacco Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Framingham Auto Sales, Inc. v. Workers' Credit UnionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1996
- Williams v. ArndtDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1985
- Ben Elfman & Son, Inc. v. Criterion Mills, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1991
- Curtis Manufacturing Co. v. Plasti-Clip Corp.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1994
- Berliner Foods Corp. v. Pillsbury Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.