Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Archie v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)

Decided January 3, 2006No. 10-04-00153-CRPublished

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBill Vance, Justice

I agree that the trial court erred in denying Archie’s motion for a mistrial and that the trial court’s error was harmful. Thus I join in reversing the judgment assessing punishment for felony aggravated assault and remanding that cause to the trial court. However, because the trial court’s jury instruction created a new offense, I would also reverse the judgment of conviction of felony family violence assault. Because a majority affirms that judgment, I respectfully dissent.

I acknowledge that Archie did not object to the error in the charge and has not raised the issue on appeal. However, it…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  2. Hutch v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  3. Saldano v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
  4. Mann v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
  5. Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API