Legal Opinion

Boyce v. Wendt

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1943No. Docket No. 86, Calendar No. 42,255PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChandler, J.

The procedure had in this ease is so well and concisely stated by the trial court in his opinion filed in this cause that we adopt the following therefrom:

“This suit was begun August 15,1940, by Edward Boyce against Albert R. Wendt, and Fred H. Roth, individually and as trustee, for an accounting. November 22, 1940, these defendants filed an answer, sworn to, to which they attached their account; December 3d, plaintiff filed reply; on February 5,1941, by stipulation and order, the other plaintiffs were permitted to intervene; by this stipulation, such interveners adopted the plaintiff’s bill…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cobell v. NortonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
  2. Local No. 1644 v. Oakwood Hospital Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Cobell v. NortonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
  4. Merkel v. LongMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Merkel v. LongMichigan Supreme Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API