Legal Opinion

Nusbaum v. Hartford Fire Ins.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 5, 1923No. Appeal, No. 9PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Schaffer,

Defendant issued its policy of insurance to plaintiff against all direct loss and damage by fire to an amount not exceeding $5,000 on the use and occupancy of build ings belonging to the insured. The policy set forth: “The conditions of this insurance are, that if the above named buildings, or any part thereof, or the machinery, contained therein, or any part thereof, shall be destroyed, damaged or disabled by fire occurring during the term of this policy, so that the assured shall be entirely prevented from carrying on the business of, principally manufacturing…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Monmouth Park Ass'n v. Wallis Iron WorksSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1892
  2. Livingstone v. Boston InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  3. Stacey v. Franklin Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1841
  4. Teutonia Fire Insurance v. Mund ex rel. BiddleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1883
  5. Walker v. DouglasIllinois Supreme Court · 1873

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. New England Gas & Electric Ass'n v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953
  2. Neal D. Ivey Co. v. Franklin Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  3. NATIONAL UN. FIRE INS. CO. v. Anderson-Prichard Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944
  4. Eastern Associated Coal Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
  5. Erie Insurance Exchange v. Transamerica InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API