Kelley v. Spencer

“To authorize the reformation of a contract which has been reduced to writing and signed, the proof must be clear, exact, and satisfactory — first, that the writing does not- truly express the intention of the parties — that on which their two minds had agreed; and, second, what it was the parties had intended the-writing should express. Guilmartin v. Urquhart, 82 Ala. 571, 1 So. 897.

In White v. Henderson-Boyd Co., 165 Ala. 218, 51 So. 764, we said:

“To entitle a complainant to such relief it is incumbent on him to show, by clear, exact, and convincing proof that the intention and agreement he…