Legal Opinion

Hyatt v. Ogletree

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided November 3, 1942No. 8 Div. 221PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMPSON, Judge.

The suit is for breach of general covenants of warranty in a deed.

The appellant, Hyatt, was the grantee who sues the grantor, Ogletree.

(The plaintiffs, husband and wife, are referred to as singular.)

The recited consideration of the deed is “one dollar and other considerations”, but it is conceded that nothing was paid. The deed contains a recital that a quitclaim deed, conveying the property, was previously given by the grantor to the grantee and that the warranty deed was “made to perfect and warrant the title in the grantee.”

The question presented by the appeal is whether,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bethea v. McCulloughSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  2. Lipham v. ShambleeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  3. Gilliland v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  4. Union Bank & Trust Co. v. RoyallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  5. Pruett v. First Nat. Bank of AnnistonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Stallings v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  2. Touchstone v. PetersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  3. Dudley v. FridgeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  4. Goodwyn, Mills & Cawood, Inc. v. Markel Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  5. Sunshine Bank v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API