Marsh v. Marsh
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Toal, Justice:
The issue presented in this domestic action is whether proceeds of a personal injury settlement acquired during the marriage are entirely marital property subject to the family court’s jurisdiction. We hold under our equitable distribution statute that these proceeds constitute marital property, and therefore, affirm the family court’s order equitably dividing these proceeds.
FACTS
In 1984, Mr. Marsh (hereinafter “Husband”) was injured in a work-related automobile accident. In 1989, Husband re- ceivecl a $325,000 settlement from the Highway Department as compensation for his 1984…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Van De Loo v. Van De LooCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- Weisfeld v. WeisfeldSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
- Unkle v. UnkleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- Campbell v. CampbellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1986
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Lundquist v. LundquistAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
- Drake v. DrakeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Tramel v. TramelMississippi Supreme Court · 1999
- Inniss v. InnissSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2016
- Drake v. DrakeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.