Martin H. Aussenberg v. Bruce S. Kramer, David J. Cocke, and Borod and Kramer

LILLARD, Judge.

In this case, Plaintiff, Martin H. Aussen-berg (“Aussenberg”), appeals the trial court’s valuation of his former partnership’s work-in-progress and accounts receivable as well as its finding regarding Aussenberg’s interest in the partnership’s accounts receivable and work-in-progress. We affirm the decision of the trial court.

In March 1988, Aussenberg and Defendants, Bruce S. Kramer (“Kramer”) and David J. Cocke (“Cocke”), formed a partnership for the practice of law under the name of Borod and Kramer. In June 1991, Aus-senberg was asked to leave the partnership. A dispute…