Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Ex Parte Sanders

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 16, 1932No. 13512Published

1Concurrence

Mr. Acting Associate Justice C. C. Featherstone, Circuit Judge

(concurring) : Sanders, who is claiming a preference, had a check for more than $3,000.00 given him by a depositor of Bamberg bank.

The check was good; he presented it, and at his request got part of it in cash, and the balance in a draft on a bank in Charleston.

He held the draft for about fifteen days, and then presented it to Charleston bank, when payment was refused, for the reason that, in the meantime, Bamberg bank had failed.

At the time draft was given him, and for many days thereafter, Bamberg bank had on deposit, in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Livingstain v. Columbian Banking & Trust Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
  2. Enterprise Bank v. Federal Land BankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
  3. Hampton Loan & Exchange Bank v. LightseySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1930
  4. Peurifoy v. First National Bank of BatesburgSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
  5. Railway Express Agency v. BetheaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API