Legal Opinion

Enterprise Bank v. Federal Land Bank

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 12, 1927No. 12204PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Cothran.

This is an action by the plaintiff, as assignee, to foreclose a certain alleged mortgage executed by Maud Talley and L. O. Talley to J. L- Chastain, dated January 23, 1920, as security for the payment of six notes of $216.70 each, aggregating $1,300.20, and covering a certain tract of land, _ » described in the complaint, containing 50 acres more or less. The Talley notes and mortgage were assigned by J. E. Chastain to the plaintiff, Enterprise Bank, eight days later, on January 3E 1920, as collateral security for the payment of a…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Wilkins, Neely & Jones v. GibsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  2. Emmert v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  3. Home Savings Bank v. BierstadtIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Bruse v. NelsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1872
  5. Union Mortgage, Banking & Trust Co. v. Peters & TrezevantMississippi Supreme Court · 1895

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Bank of New York v. NallyIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Fed. Land Bk. of Columbia v. GodwinSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
  3. Home Owners' Loan Corp. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
  4. Houston v. Bank of America Federal Savings BankNevada Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Dodge City of Spartanburg, Inc. v. JonesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1995

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API