Legal Opinion

Specialties Distributing Co. v. Whitehead

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1946No. Docket No. 32, Calendar No. 43,226PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarr, J.

This case was heard and submitted in the trial court on a stipulation of facts and on the pleadings filed. To such stipulation defendant Whitehead was not a party. He was not served with process, nor did he enter an appearance. On the affidavit of counsel for plaintiff an -order of publication was issued and mailed to the last-known address of defendant Whitehead but was not delivered. The order was then published.

The stipulation recites that on July 12, 1940, defendant Whitehead borrowed $750 from the defendant and cross-plaintiff, Detroit Creamery Company, to secure the payment of which he…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Bowling Green Trust Co. v. BarnettSupreme Court of Missouri · 1912
  2. Williams v. FischleinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
  3. Eisner v. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Williamson v. FalkenhagenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ooley v. CollinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Lucking v. Welbilt Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1958
  3. City of Southfield v. Shefa LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2022
  4. Coast-to-Coast Produce, LLC v. Lakeside Produce USA, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API