Legal Opinion
HRG Development Corp. v. Graphic Arts Mutual Insurance
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided September 14, 1988No. 87-671PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
This action was brought pursuant to G. L. c. 231A, seeking a declaration of the rights and duties of the parties under a so-called “all risk” contract of insurance issued to the plaintiff (HRG) by the defendant (Graphic Arts). After a hearing on the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, the judge filed a “memorandum of decision” and entered summary judgment against the plaintiff. From that judgment the plaintiff appeals.
HRG (formerly known as Goldstein & Gurwitz, Inc.) purchased a multi-peril insurance policy on or before May 1, 1985, for the policy period of May 1, 1985, through May 1,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sun Insurance Office, Limited v. ClaySupreme Court of Florida · 1961
- Mellon v. Federal Ins. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1926
- Standard Electric Supply Co. v. Norfolk & Dedham Mutual Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1974
- Greene v. CheethamCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- Nevers v. Aetna Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. v. Ace American Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Vermont · 2022
- Philadelphia Parking Authority v. Federal InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- University of Cincinnati v. Arkwright Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- Bettigole v. American Employers InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1991
- Crestview Country Club, Inc. v. St. Paul Guardian InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.