Legal Opinion

Dlaikan v. Roodbeen

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 6, 1994No. Docket 155595PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtR. D. Gotham, J.

Defendants Henry Roodbeen, Clara Seeley, and St. Pius School appeal by leave granted from the circuit order that denied their motion for summary disposition, which had asserted that the court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction over the action. We reverse and order the dismissal of plaintiffs’ claims against defendants.

This is an action by three families against various representatives of the St. Pius School and the school itself. Plaintiffs brought their action to challenge the decision of Father Henry Roodbeen, pastor of the Parish of St. Pius X, not to accept plaintiffs’ children as…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Borgman v. BultemaMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Bennison v. SharpMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Berry v. BruceMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
  4. MacIejewski v. BreitenbeckMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Department of Natural Resources v. Holloway Construction Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1991

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Isely v. Capuchin ProvinceDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1995
  2. People v. LawsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Flynn v. EstevezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  4. Bettina Winkler v. Marist Fathers of Detroit IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. Pilgrim's Rest Baptist Church v. Arthur Pearson SrMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API