Isely v. Capuchin Province
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR DIRECTED VERDICT/JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW
ROSEN, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter is presently before the Court on the Motion of Defendants Capuchin Province, St. Lawrence Seminary, Lloyd Thiel, Kevin Hoelscher, Myron Kowalsky, Werner Wolf and Ron Smith (the “non-abuser Defendants”) for Judgment as a Matter of Law pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.Pro. 50 and, on the separate “Motion for Directed Verdict” 1 filed by individual Defendant Jim Wolf. Both of these motions were submitted to the Court after Plaintiff concluded his proofs. The Court…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Serbian Eastern Orthodox Diocese for United States and Canada v. MilivojevichSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- National Labor Relations Board v. Catholic BishopSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Kedroff v. Saint Nicholas Cathedral of the Russian Orthodox Church in North AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Gonzalez v. Roman Catholic Archbishop of ManilaSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- CJC v. Corporation of Catholic BishopWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- Malicki v. DoeSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
- Pritzlaff v. Archdiocese of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
- Schovanec v. Archdiocese of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
- Doe v. EvansSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.