Advance Thresher Co. v. Doak
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Jackson County; J. T. Johnson, Judge. Action by the Advance Thresher Company against D. B. Doak and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
AMES, C.
The plaintiff sued the defendants upon certain promissory notes for a balance of $1,1"1'2.89, alleging that this balance remained due after it had. foreclosed a chattel mortgage upon certain threshing machinery which it had sold to the defendants. The answers admitted the purchase of the threshing machinery and the execution of the notes and chattel mortgage, but alleged that, at the time the notes were executed, there was an express agreement between the plaintiff and the defendants that they should not become valid or binding until they had been executed by two other…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Continental Gin Co. v. De BordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Stauffer v. CampbellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Harrill v. WeerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Hoover v. BrookshireSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
3Cited by13 opinions
- Clark v. DuncansonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Stolfa v. GainesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Caples v. MorganOregon Supreme Court · 1916
- Nellis v. MintonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Adams v. Heirs of McKinneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.