Legal Opinion

United States v. Perez-Valdera

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided October 10, 1995No. S 93 Cr. 956 (PKL)PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ORDER

LEISURE, District Judge:

Defendant Danilo Perez-Valdera (“defendant”) moves to dismiss the first count of a three-count Superseding Indictment, which charges him with unlawfully reentering the United States, after lawful deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. In addition, defendant moves to sever for trial this first count of the Superseding Indictment from counts two and three. For the reasons stated below, the Court denies defendant’s motion to dismiss count one of the Superseding Indictment, and grants his motion to sever for trial count one of the Superseding…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Mennonite Board of Missions v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc. v. PopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. United States v. Mendoza-LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. G-Y-RBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2001
  2. Mohammed Simon LAHMIDI, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  3. Livant v. CliftonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2004
  4. S-MBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1998
  5. LEBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API