Legal Opinion · Dissent

Pisano v. Shillinger

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 1991No. 90-294Published

1DissentUrbigkit, Chief Justice

I dissent from this decision presented alternatively by a Motion to Set Bail and by an Emergency Petition for a Writ of Habe-as Corpus for which this majority denies access to bail following reincarceration during the administrative process directed to revoke parole. The majority phrases inquiry about entitlement as whether “to be admitted to bail after his apprehension and detention as a parole violator.” The power of words! The actual issue is right to bail until status of violation of parole has actually been determined. The majority again rephrases since in this case, it actually now…

2Cases cited62 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Honig v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  5. Moody v. DaggettSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API