Legal Opinion

Canaday v. Brainard

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided August 1, 1958No. 4, 1958PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Southerland, C. J.:

This is a suit for brokers’ commissions. It concerns the activities of two industrial brokers, Samuel Vance, Jr. and Millar Brainard, in attempting to effect a sale of the interest of Ward M. Canady, the defendant, in Willys-Overland Motors, Inc.

(Brainard died before the suit was brought.)

The plaintiffs asserted that Vance and Brainard were employed by Canaday to find a purchaser for Canaday’s holdings upon an understanding, either expressed or implied, that Canaday would pay them if successful; that Brainard did find such a purchaser in the ICaiser-Frazer Company; that the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sibbald v. . the Bethlehem Iron CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Slaughter v. StaffordSupreme Court of Delaware · 1958
  3. Weiss v. Northern Dredge & Dock Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1928

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Legros v. TarrOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. A.I.C. Ltd. v. Mapco Petroleum Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1989
  3. B-H, Inc. v. "Industrial America", Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1969
  4. Nepa v. MartaSupreme Court of Delaware · 1975
  5. Rees-Thomson-Scroggins, Inc. v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API