Legal Opinion

Continental Contract Carrier Corp. v. United States

District Court, C.D. California

Decided March 18, 1970No. Civ. No. 68-919PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER

Before BARNES, Circuit Judge, and GRAY and REAL, District Judges. WILLIAM P. GRAY, District Judge.

The plaintiff, Continental Contract Carrier Corporation (Continental), filed an action under 28 U.S.C. § 1336 to set aside a decision and order of the Interstate Commerce Commission, which denied it permanent authority to operate as a contract carrier for Roberts Consolidated Industries, Inc. (Roberts or shipper).

Roberts intervened in this action on behalf of the plaintiff. The Commission is supported by the Regular Common Carrier Conference of the American…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Interstate Commerce Commission v. J-T Transport Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Alamo Express, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  2. Jefferson Trucking Co. v. ALA. PUB. SERV. COM.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  3. Interstate Contract Carrier Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1974
  4. Meridian Knit Finishers, Ltd. v. Rosen Trucking Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API