Legal Opinion

Harrisburg v. Cemetery Assn., Aplnt.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 21, 1928No. Appeal, 4PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Simpson,

The City of Harrisburg paved a street upon which defendant’s cemetery abuts, filed a municipal claim to recover a due proportion of the cost, and obtained a verdict and judgment. As, presumptively, the property is liable, and defendant’s appeal raises no point regarding the proofs or the amount of the judgment, we need only consider the three reasons urged as showing exemption from such liability. '

Defendant first relies on section 5 of the Act of June 4, 1901, P. L. 364, 366, as amended by the Act of May 28,1915, P. L. 599, 602. It is there stated that “All real…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Sunbeam Water Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  2. Commonwealth v. Lowry-Rodgers Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  3. Broad StreetSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  4. Beltzhoover Borough v. Heirs of BeltzhooverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
  5. City of Philadelphia v. Union Burial Ground SocietySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Dougherty, Tr. v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Evans v. West Norriton Township Municipal AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  3. City of Philadelphia v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Hollywood Cemetery Assn. v. PowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Ivy Hill Cemetery Company's AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API