Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Department of Health & Welfare v. Doe

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 2009No. 35790Published

1Concurrence

HORTON, J.,

specially concurring.

I join in the majority’s conclusion that Appellant’s premature filing of the notice of appeal to this Court deprives us of jurisdiction to entertain the instant appeal. However, given the fundamental liberty interest associated with the parent-child relationship, I believe that a discussion of this Court’s shared responsibility for Appellant’s failure to file a timely notice of appeal and discussion of the merits of this appeal is warranted. Appellant claims that there is insufficient evidence supporting the magistrate court’s order terminating her parental…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Quilloin v. WalcottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. State v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Doe v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Tanner v. State, Department of Health & WelfareIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2007

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API