Nash v. Jones
West Virginia Supreme Court
cited 10 Am. & Eng. Euc. Law, 11, 12 n. 2, 30, 32, 43; 2 Sug. Vend. & Pnrch. (14th Ed.) 703; 2 Sto. Eq. Jur. (8th Ed.) 1201a; 41 Ark. 393; 36 Iowa, 125; 2 Johns. Ch. 405, 409, 415; 50 Ark. 71; 30 Gratt. 744, 751; 23 W. Va. 480; 15 W. Va. 568. cited Code, c. 125, ss. 35, 36; 41 W. Va. 314; 36 W. Va. 350; 2 Wheat. 290; 22 Am. & Eng. Enc. Law, 1018; Fry, Specif. Perf. 347; Pom. Eq. § 1405; 32 W. Va. 566; 34 W. Va. 709.
1Opinion of the Court
English, Judge:
On the 7th day of March, 1892, M. H. Nash and T. B. *770Drinkard tiled their bill in equity at rules then held for the Circuit Court of Mercer county against Id. C. Jones, N. H. McClaugherty, and R. C. McClaugherty, praying for the specific execution of an alleged contract for the purchase of a certain piece or parcel of land, situated in the west end of the city of Bluefield, in said county, adjoining the lands of the Bluefield Land Association, R. C. McClaugherty, N. II. McClaugherty, II. C. Jones, and others, which lot of land is more particularly described in the bill.
The…
2Cited by12 opinions
- Floyd v. DuffyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1910
- Carkonen v. AlbertsWashington Supreme Court · 1938
- Matney v. YatesCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1917
- Dye v. DyeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1946
- Ensminger v. PetersonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1903
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.