Legal Opinion
Reich v. Muth
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided September 1, 1994No. Nos. 93-1689, 93-1793PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by published opinion. Chief Judge ERVIN wrote the opinion, in which Judge WIDENER and Judge WILSON joined.
OPINION
ERVIN, Chief Judge:
In response to a refusal to comply with an administrative subpoena, the Secretary of *242Labor, acting through the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (hereinafter “the Secretary” or “OSHA”), brought this enforcement action, pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 657(b), in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. The district court ordered the respondents to comply with the subpoena, but denied OSHA’s request to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Whirlpool Corp. v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- James T. CLARY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. OCEAN DRILLING AND EXPLORATION CO., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Taylor v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1980
- U. S. Air, Inc., Formerly Allegheny Airlines, Inc. v. Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission, and Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
- Reich v. National Engineering & Contracting Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
3Cited by3 opinions
- Chao v. Transocean Offshore, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- Konow v. SlettenHanover County Circuit Court · 2010
- Robert B. Reich, Secretary of Labor United States Department of Labor v. Wayne Muth, Individually Ed Speary, Individually Jason Nuss, Individually Mike Warner, Individually Hiller Systems, Incorporated, and Randy Hughes, Individually, Robert B. Reich, Secretary of Labor United States Department of Labor v. Wayne Muth, Individually Ed Speary, Individually Jason Nuss, Individually Mike Warner, Individually Hiller Systems, Incorporated, and Randy Hughes, IndividuallyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994