Legal Opinion
Reich v. National Engineering & Contracting Co.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided December 14, 1993No. 92-2598PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DONALD RUSSELL, Circuit Judge:
Defendants National Engineering & Contracting Company and Tri-State Steel Construction Company appeal the district court’s order enforcing subpoenas that required them to produce certain safety records for the Secretary of Labor. We find no error in the order and affirm.
I
The Occupational Safety and Health Act (the Act), 29 U.S.C. §§ 651-678, was enacted “to assure so far as possible every working man and woman in the Nation safe and healthful working conditions.” 29 U.S.C. § 651(b). In enforcing the Act, the Secretary of Labor (the Secretary), acting…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Church of Scientology of California v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Cobbledick v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- See v. City of SeattleSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- New York v. BurgerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Dana Point Safe Harbor Collective v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- In re Oral Testimony of a Witness Subpoenaed Pursuant to Civil Investigative Demand No. 98-19District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1998
- Reich v. MuthCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
- 16 O.S.H. Cas.(bna) 1489, 16 O.S.H. Cas.(bna) 1608, 1994 O.S.H.D. (Cch) P 30,285 Robert B. Reich, Secretary of Labor v. National Engineering & Contracting Company Tri-State Steel Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
- NextG Networks of NY, Inc. v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.