Legal Opinion

Rio Grande Valley Vein Clinic, P.A., D/B/A Rgv Vein Laser & Aesthetic Clinic v. Yvette Guerrero

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 2014No. 12-0843PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

In Bioderm Skin Care, LLC v. Sok, we held that a claim for improper laser hair removal is a health care liability claim because expert health care testimony was necessary to prove or refute the claim that the procedure was performed improperly. 426 S.W.3d 753, 760 (Tex.2014). Specifically, we concluded expert health care testimony was needed because federal regulations restrict the laser to supervised use in a medical practice, and the claimant there did not rebut the presumption that her claim was a health care liability claim.

Likewise, here we conclude the claimant has not rebutted the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Loaisiga v. CerdaTexas Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Texas West Oaks Hospital, LP v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Bioderm Skin Care, LLC and Quan Nguyen, M.D. v. Veasna "sandee" SokTexas Supreme Court · 2014

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Mary Lou Ortiz, Joanne Ortiz and Jesus Ortiz v. St. Teresa Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2019
  2. State v. Emeritus CorporationCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
  3. Matthew D. Barrow, M.D., P.A. v. Suzette Carnes, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2014
  4. City of Houston v. Najla Hussein and Asha Obeid, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2020
  5. Dana L. Plummer, Individually and as Surviving Parent of Madyson Tavia Plummer, and Ronald K. Plummer, Individually and as Surviving Parent of Madyson Tavia Plummer v. Kari G. Frano, D.O. and Kari G. Frano, D.O., P.A., Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2024

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API