Legal Opinion
Matthew D. Barrow, M.D., P.A. v. Suzette Carnes
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
Decided June 5, 2014No. 05-13-01065-CVPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by Justice Lewis.
This is an interlocutory appeal from orders denying motions to dismiss filed by appellants Matthew D. Barrows, M.D., P.A. d/b/a Dermatology & Skin Cancer Surgery Center (Barrows) and Melissa McAnally (McAnally). Appellee Suzette Carnes (Carnes) sued Barrows and Mc-Anally seeking damages for injuries she sustained during an intense pulsed light (IPL) skin rejuvenation procedure. For the reasons that follow, we reverse and remand to the trial court for further proceedings.
BACKGROUND
Carnes sought IPL skin rejuvenation treatments from the RejuveDermMD Aesthetic…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Diversicare General Partner, Inc. v. RubioTexas Supreme Court · 2005
- Loaisiga v. CerdaTexas Supreme Court · 2012
- Texas West Oaks Hospital, LP v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 2012
- Marks v. St. Luke's Episcopal HospitalTexas Supreme Court · 2010
- Bioderm Skin Care, LLC and Quan Nguyen, M.D. v. Veasna "sandee" SokTexas Supreme Court · 2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.