Legal Opinion

Herrod v. Larkins

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 23, 1931PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Counsel for appellant asks for a rule on the clerk to direct him to file the transcript offered in this case. There appears as a notation from the judge’s docket the following: “8/18/30. Judgment of lower court affirmed. 8/18/30, Motion for new trial filed; overruled; exceptions saved. Appeal prayed and granted and 60 days given to file bill of exceptions.” The offered transcript also shows that motion for new trial was “filed 9/16/30.”

Thus it will he seen that there is no final judgment entered of record from which an appeal will lie. In Lowenstein v. Caruth, 59 Ark. 588, 28 S. W. 421, it…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lowe v. HartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  2. Los Angeles County Bank v. RaynorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  3. McConnell v. BourlandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  4. Chatfield v. JarrattSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
  5. Lowenstein v. CaruthSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1894

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Reeves v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  2. American-Canadian Oil & Drilling Corp. v. Aldridge & StroudSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
  3. City of Monticello v. KimbroSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
  4. Hollaway v. BerenzenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1945
  5. Jones v. HardestySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API