Legal Opinion

Bloomquist v. Goose River Bank

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 29, 2013No. 20130059PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] Tim Bloomquist appeals from a district court summary judgment dismissing his action against Goose River Bank and Goose River Holding Company (collectively “the Bank”) for breach of an alleged oral contract to loan money. We affirm, concluding the alleged oral contract is barred by the statute of frauds.

I

[¶ 2] In 2009, Bloomquist learned that certain farmland he had been renting was going to be sold at auction. Bloomquist alleges he had discussions with the president of the Bank’s Hillsboro branch about obtaining a loan to purchase the property. Bloomquist claims the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. WollNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Thompson v. North Dakota Workers' Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  3. A.G. Golden v. SM Energy CompanyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Johnson Farms v. McEnroeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Delzer v. United Bank of BismarckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Knorr v. NorbergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Klein v. SlettoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Farm Credit Services of North Dakota PCA v. A & C Soaring Eagle TruckingDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2020
  4. Knorr v. NorbergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API