Legal Opinion
Rich v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided May 11, 1976No. 10106PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Per curiam
This is an appeal from two amended Judgment and Commitment Orders entered pursuant to a plea of guilty to unauthorized use of a motor vehicle 1 and false pretenses. 2 The sole issue raised on appeal is whether the court below erred by entering the written amendments to the original Judgment and Commitment Orders. We affirm.
At the sentencing proceeding held on September 26, 1975, the presiding judge made the following oral pronouncement:
Well, Mr. Rich, on these two offenses . the Court is going to sentence you, and they will be concurrent sentences, for an indeterminate time under the Youth…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Frank Kennedy v. Curtis Reid, Superintendent, District of Columbia JailCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
- Downey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1937
- Willie Junior Rakes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1962
- Bellam v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
- Fisher v. SmallDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1960
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Davis v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Gray v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- Clement v. District of Columbia Department of Human ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- Valentine v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- Newton v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.